Rick Reilly’s father in law claims he was misquoted in piece that defended the Redskins name

Just last month,  ESPN’s columnist Rick reilly wrote a piece in order to support the Redskins name.

Reilly used his Father-in-law Bob Burns, who’s a Blackfeet elder as the main point of his article claiming that he’s said he doesn’t care about the name.

Well according to Deadspin,  Burns ended up writing a letter to the Indian Country  Today Media Network claiming that Reilly misquoted him.

So you can imagine my dismay when I saw my name and words used to defend the racist Washington Redskins name. My son-in-law, ESPN’s Rick Reilly, completely misunderstood the conversation we had, quoting me as saying “the whole issue is so silly. The name just doesn’t bother me much. It’s an issue that shouldn’t be an issue, not with all the problems we’ve got in this country.”

But that’s not what I said.

What I actually said is that “it’s silly in this day and age that this should even be a battle — if the name offends someone, change it.” He failed to include my comments that the term “redskins” demeans Indians, and historically is insulting and offensive, and that I firmly believe the Washington Redskins should change their name.

When Rick’s article came out, it upset me to be portrayed as an “Uncle Tom” in support of this racial slur. I asked him to correct the record. He has not, so I must do it myself.

Wow,  really Reilly?  ESPN only hires the best.